Tobacco-Free Marion County

GRASSROOTS NEWSLETTER

November-December 2007Volume 6  Number 3

 

Dear Members and Friends of TFMC, Two points of interest for this letter came out of the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) of 1998. One is that the tobacco industry agreed to limitations imposed on tobacco advertising (such as sponsoring sporting events like car races and tennis tournaments, displaying outdoor ads on billboards, and print ads in certain magazines with a high percentage of young readers, for example), and the other is that the focus of tobacco marketing cannot be specifically designed to appeal to children.  The tobacco industry in the U.S. responded with a 94% increase in their marketing budget, up from $6.9 BILLION in 1998 to $13.4 BILLION in 2005, according to the latest data available from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which monitors these expenditures.  

 

In recent years, the tobacco industry has focused its marketing budget on discounts to offset price increases from tobacco taxes, along with point of purchase (POP) or point of sale (POS) promotions.   This boils down to in-your-face tobacco advertising and product display and placement in retail outlets in your hometown.  The Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids estimates the tobacco industry spends $160.5 MILLION per year in Arkansas.  Figured, per capita, using US Census Quick Facts, they spend approximately $963,000 a year in Marion County to promote tobacco use.

 

According to a 2007 study published in the Tobacco Control Online Journal, More than meets the eye:  on the importance of retail cigarette advertising,” the tobacco industry has been planning since at least 1970 for the inevitability of tighter restrictions in response to increasing independent scientific and health-focused research.  The tobacco industry merchandiser’s goal is “intrusive visibility”.  Author Richard W. Pollay itemizes POS promotions as

 

banners, displays, posters, easels, shelf signs, streamers, wall units, window displays and cards, floor stands, dump bins, counter-top units, illuminated signs, cash register tools (eg, change trays, customer merchandise dividers, receipt coupons and message imprints), shopping carts and baskets, end-of-aisle displays, racks, gantries, kiosks, overhead hangers, price cards, interactive units, aisle directories, waste baskets, mechanical product dispensers, ashtrays, closed circuit television and radio broadcasts, electronic scrolling ads, clocks, "hours open" signage, carpets and floor mats, laser projections onto floors and walls, oversized mock-ups of packets, newspaper and magazine racks, etc. New computer and projection technologies are being employed to create displays with interactivity, customisation of messaging, dynamic and vivid illuminated images.  

 

The effect of this is that every time anyone goes to the store, that person, young or old, smoker or nonsmoker, rich or poor, is exposed to promotion of tobacco.  This typically happens at every gas, every convenience, and every grocery store visit.  This increases the perception that tobacco use is pervasive and normal part of life, in what economists and social scientists call the “friendly familiarity” effect.

 

Because consumers use the retail presence as an indicator of how popular products are, a substantial oversized display conveys that many people are smokers. This is in addition to whatever else might be conveyed regarding special offers, pricing, brand imagery, etc. This perceived popularity effect occurs at the brand level, as consumers discern which brands are the more popular. It also occurs at the product level, as consumers discern the popularity of cigarettes by their centrality and predominance in the retail milieu.*

 

Here in Marion County we track in-store and on-store tobacco advertising and product placement in 13 retail stores near schools and/or parks using the “Operation Storefront” protocol.  Here are the results of this year’s survey, expressed as a comparison to the last survey, conducted in 2005.

100% decrease in number of merchants creating outdoor tobacco ads IMPROVEMENT

Decrease of 10 store-made signs displayed outside IMPROVEMENT

9% fewer stores displayed pro made outside ads and other tobacco promotions IMPROVEMENT

3.5 average fewer signs on stores with outside ads;

3 average fewer signs on all surveyed sites IMPROVEMENT

33% increase in # of stores with anti-smoking signs IMPROVEMENT

31% sites still have cigarettes available for customer self-service.  New law is that all cigarette products are to be placed behind the counter. PROBLEM

15% increase in clerk-controlled smokeless tobacco IMPROVEMENT

17% increase in clerk-controlled other tobacco products IMPROVEMENT

53% increase in cigarettes placed near candy PROBLEM

43% decrease in tobacco signs placed near candy  IMPROVEMENT

21% increase in tobacco signs placed 3 feet or lower PROBLEM

No significant change in the overall number of professionally made inside tobacco ads and promotions, but there was a 15% decrease in the total number of tobacco advertisements in surveyed sites in Marion County Arkansas  IMPROVEMENT

 

Professor Pollay summarized his article with the following recommendation for tobacco prevention regarding tobacco industry POP (point of purchase)/ POS (point of sale) promotions.

POP advertising exposes and potentially affects everyone: the young who grow up seeing tobacco as a benign cultural commonplace in the market on a par with milk and bread and come to underestimate its risks; the adult smoker who is reminded and cued to smoke now and more often; the occasional smoker who is cued to consume more; the would-be quitter whose intentions to quit are undermined; and the ex-smoker tempted to relapse and resume smoking. Regulation of both the amount (size) and character (brand imagery) of POS advertising is, therefore, a legitimate and important component of the tobacco control strategy, with substantial potential for advancing public health, particularly in jurisdictions where it is the predominant mode of sale promotion.  *http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/16/4/270  

 

In April of 2007 Matthew Meyers with The Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids issued a press release

wherein he said, “The 2005 total includes $13.1 billion in cigarette marketing and $250.8 million in smokeless tobacco marketing. …The staggering amounts spent on tobacco marketing should be a wakeup call to elected officials at all levels that the battle against tobacco use is far from won. We must be as aggressive in fighting tobacco use as the tobacco companies are in promoting their deadly and addictive products.    http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/Script/DisplayPressRelease.php3?Display=987&zoom_highlight=marketing

 

TFMC members, please speak to our local retailers and thank those who have minimized or eliminated tobacco signage, and remind those with heavy saturation of signs or signs and products at child’s eye height that you’d like them to quit marketing tobacco to children.

 

 

 

Tobacco-Free Marion County

PO Box 188

Pyatt, AR  72672